[alsa-devel] Intel hda ICH7 not worked anymore after using wine (SOLVED!). Problems again

[Xavi de Blas]

Hi

2008/5/15 Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>:
> At Thu, 15 May 2008 03:26:00 +0200,
> Xavi de Blas wrote:
>>
>> Hello, we have been talking on this thread:
>>
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001939.html
>>
>> because i had a problem with my hda that Takashi said it's really
>> specific to my hardware:
>>
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001963.html
>>
>> Now with kernel 2.6.24-16 and alsa 1.0.16, i have no audio again:
>>
>> i tried now using the patch Tobin made:
>>
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001934.html
>>
>> and it' doesn't work. In fact, i haven't used the patch, i only added the line:
>>
>>       { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>> after the line:
>>       { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>>
>> on: /usr/local/src/alsa-driver-1.0.16/alsa-kernel/pci/hda/patch_analog.c
>>
>> ./configure, make, sudo make install
>>
>> on reboot, the error is the same as before:
>>
>> dmesg|grep alsa
>> [   41.284537] ALSA
>> /build/buildd/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-2.6.24/debian/build/build-generic/sound/alsa-driver/pci/hda/hda_codec.c:230:
>> hda_codec: invalid dep_range_val 53:1a
>
> This means that the codec information is fairly broken.
> The driver should work still.  It just ignores the broken entries.
>
> As this doesn't happen (the first time I got this kind of problem from
> the good working codec support), I suspect the hardware problem..
>

But this it's exactly the same error message i had in previous kernel,
and it gets solved with the patch.

Do you think there's a solution for me?
Why don't work now?
Do you need more logs of my system?

Thanks a lot

>
> Takashi
>
>>
>> here is my /proc/asound/card0/codec#0
>>
>> http://pastebin.ca/1018596
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>>
>> 2007/7/9 Xavi de Blas <xaviblas at gmail.com>:
>> > It worked!!!
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot
>> >
>> > I thought my hardware was broken!
>> >
>> > 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>:
>> >>
>> >> Patch needs to be applied as follows:
>> >>
>> >> cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel
>> >> patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch
>> >> cd ..
>> >>
>> >> Then you can rerun configure && make && make install.
>> >>
>> >> Tobin
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>:
>> >> > Sorry for missing this thread.  I just woke up.
>> >> >
>> >> > I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows
>> >> > up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981.  This is why the Analog
>> >> > driver patch isn't detecting it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14?  It should detect
>> >> > this codec.  Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a
>> >> > bios issue.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it
>> >> broke the
>> >> bios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some reboots
>> >> later. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, sound
>> >> never worked again
>> >>
>> >> When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ cat
>> >> LenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1
>> >> patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.c
>> >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 3402.
>> >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> >> pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ cat
>> >> patch_analog.c.rej
>> >> *************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a
>> >> *** 3402,3407 ****
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
>> >> --- 3402,3408 ----
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>> >> +       { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },
>> >>        { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The patch is ok?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> (Tobin sorry for sending messge two times)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>
>> >
>>
>