[alsa-devel] Intel hda ICH7 not worked anymore after using wine (SOLVED!)

[Xavi de Blas]

It worked!!!

Thanks a lot

I thought my hardware was broken!

2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>:
>
>  Patch needs to be applied as follows:
>
>  cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel
> patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch
> cd ..
>
> Then you can rerun configure && make && make install.
>
> Tobin
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:
>
> 2007/7/9, Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>:> Sorry for missing this thread.  I just woke up.>> I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows> up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981.  This is why the Analog> driver patch isn't detecting it.>> Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14?  It should detect> this codec.  Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a> bios issue.>
> I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it broke thebios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some rebootslater. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, soundnever worked again
> When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems:
>
> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ catLenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.cHunk #1 FAILED at 3402.1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej
>
> xavier at corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ catpatch_analog.c.rej*************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a*** 3402,3407 ****       { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },       { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },       { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },       { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },       { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },       { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },--- 3402,3408 ----       { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 },       { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 },       { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },+       { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },       { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },       { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },       { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
>
> The patch is ok?
> Thanks
> (Tobin sorry for sending messge two times)
>
>   --
> Tobin Davis <tdavis at dsl-only.net>
>