At Fri, 16 May 2008 02:29:23 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:

Hi

2008/5/15 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de:

...

At Thu, 15 May 2008 03:26:00 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:

...

Hello, we have been talking on this thread:

http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001939.html

because i had a problem with my hda that Takashi said it's really specific to my hardware:

http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001963.html

Now with kernel 2.6.24-16 and alsa 1.0.16, i have no audio again:

i tried now using the patch Tobin made:

http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2007-July/001934.html

and it' doesn't work. In fact, i haven't used the patch, i only added the line:

  { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },

after the line: { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },

on: /usr/local/src/alsa-driver-1.0.16/alsa-kernel/pci/hda/patch_analog.c

./configure, make, sudo make install

on reboot, the error is the same as before:

dmesg|grep alsa [ 41.284537] ALSA /build/buildd/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-2.6.24/debian/build/build-generic/sound/alsa-driver/pci/hda/hda_codec.c:230: hda_codec: invalid dep_range_val 53:1a

This means that the codec information is fairly broken. The driver should work still. It just ignores the broken entries.

As this doesn't happen (the first time I got this kind of problem from the good working codec support), I suspect the hardware problem..

But this it's exactly the same error message i had in previous kernel, and it gets solved with the patch.

It got solved casually. The real problem is that your hardware reports bogus values. As I mentioned, the warning there is no fatal one. The driver still continues to probe. So, something else got broken.

Do you think there's a solution for me? Why don't work now? Do you need more logs of my system?

I'd reconsider to add some workaround if we can find any other report with the very same hardware as yours... Otherwise, I recommend you repair, at least, update BIOS if possible.

Takashi

Thanks a lot

...

Takashi

...

here is my /proc/asound/card0/codec#0

http://pastebin.ca/1018596

Thanks a lot

2007/7/9 Xavi de Blas xaviblas@gmail.com:

...

It worked!!!

Thanks a lot

I thought my hardware was broken!

2007/7/9, Tobin Davis tdavis@dsl-only.net:

...

Patch needs to be applied as follows:

cd alsa-driver-1.0.14/alsa-kernel patch -p1 < LenovoX60S.patch cd ..

Then you can rerun configure && make && make install.

Tobin

On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:25 +0200, Xavi de Blas wrote:

2007/7/9, Tobin Davis tdavis@dsl-only.net:

...

Sorry for missing this thread. I just woke up.

I looked at your first pastebin output, and the actual audio codec shows up as 0x51d41981, when it should be 0x11d41981. This is why the Analog driver patch isn't detecting it.

Can you try this patch against alsa-driver-1.0.14? It should detect this codec. Still not sure why it is misconfigured, unless there is a bios issue.

I'm afraid, probably when i tried the Linuxant codecs for the modem it broke the bios. Not sure, but sound worked, and continued working some reboots later. But when i tried a few things with wine and rebooted, sound never worked again

When i aply the patch (probably i don't do it good) there are problems:

xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14$ cat LenovoX60S.patch | patch -p1 patching file pci/hda/patch_analog.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 3402. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file pci/hda/patch_analog.c.rej

xavier@corall:/usr/local/src/alsa-src/alsa-driver-1.0.14/pci/hda$ cat patch_analog.c.rej *************** struct hda_codec_preset snd_hda_preset_a *** 3402,3407 **** { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 }, { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 }, { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 }, { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a }, --- 3402,3408 ---- { .id = 0x11d41882, .name = "AD1882", .patch = patch_ad1882 }, { .id = 0x11d41884, .name = "AD1884", .patch = patch_ad1884 }, { .id = 0x11d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },

•   { .id = 0x51d41981, .name = "AD1981", .patch = patch_ad1981 },
   { .id = 0x11d41983, .name = "AD1983", .patch = patch_ad1983 },
   { .id = 0x11d41984, .name = "AD1984", .patch = patch_ad1984 },
   { .id = 0x11d41986, .name = "AD1986A", .patch = patch_ad1986a },
  
  
  

The patch is ok?

Thanks

(Tobin sorry for sending messge two times)

-- Tobin Davis tdavis@dsl-only.net