[alsa-devel] If /dev/snd/controlCx EACCES vs. ENODEV mixup
perex at perex.cz
Sun Nov 25 23:10:32 CET 2007
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 25.11.07 22:42, Jaroslav Kysela (perex at perex.cz) wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > BTW, what's the status of the BTS? Takashi asked me to post all my
> > > issues on the ML instead of on the BTS. So why have the BTS at all?
> > > It's even linked on the alsa-project.org front page under "I found a
> > > bug!", which is a bit misleading. If this Mantis thing is not liked at
> > > all, would it be possible to make some replacement available? Maybe
> > > just use the kernel bugzilla on bugzilla.kernel.org? It's very fast,
> > > and certainly more fun to work with than with Mantis.
> > I prefer BTS but Takashi not. It's matter of personal preference. Mantis
> > is easy maintainable and we have more projects (or packages) not only
> > drivers.
> The kernel bugzilla already is used for stuff like klibc and other
> userspace support code for the kernel. I am sure noone would oppose to
> move the complete bug tracking of ALSA to the kernel bz.
But why to change to bugzilla? The basic functions of both BTSes are very
similar (except the fact I don't like perl at all). Actually, ALSA
services (server) run on a dedicated virtual XEN machine, so we can
install any software we need.
Jaroslav Kysela <perex at perex.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
More information about the Alsa-devel