[alsa-devel] If /dev/snd/controlCx EACCES vs. ENODEV mixup
mznyfn at 0pointer.de
Sun Nov 25 22:53:00 CET 2007
On Sun, 25.11.07 22:42, Jaroslav Kysela (perex at perex.cz) wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > BTW, what's the status of the BTS? Takashi asked me to post all my
> > issues on the ML instead of on the BTS. So why have the BTS at all?
> > It's even linked on the alsa-project.org front page under "I found a
> > bug!", which is a bit misleading. If this Mantis thing is not liked at
> > all, would it be possible to make some replacement available? Maybe
> > just use the kernel bugzilla on bugzilla.kernel.org? It's very fast,
> > and certainly more fun to work with than with Mantis.
> I prefer BTS but Takashi not. It's matter of personal preference. Mantis
> is easy maintainable and we have more projects (or packages) not only
The kernel bugzilla already is used for stuff like klibc and other
userspace support code for the kernel. I am sure noone would oppose to
move the complete bug tracking of ALSA to the kernel bz.
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the Alsa-devel