[RFC PATCH 1/3] topology: use inclusive language for bclk

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 9/8/20 9:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:39:13AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
>>>> -	__u8 bclk_master;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */
>>>> +	__u8 bclk_provider;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */
> 
>>> Is it 100% compatible?  Note that the uapi/* header is a copy from the
>>> kernel header, and it means that we'll change the same for the kernel,
>>> too.
> 
>> It's absolutely 100% compatible by design.
>> I was planning to update the kernel uapi header to align changes, but the
>> volume of code is much lower on the alsa-lib side. Will resubmit with the
>> preferred provider/consumer wording.
> 
> It's binary compatible but it'd break the build for any existing code
> using the UAPI headers.

Sorry, I don't fully get the comment. Aren't the uapi headers copied 
into each software tree that relies on them?