[RFC PATCH 1/3] topology: use inclusive language for bclk

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:39:13AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

> > > -	__u8 bclk_master;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */
> > > +	__u8 bclk_provider;	/* SND_SOC_TPLG_BCLK_ value */

> > Is it 100% compatible?  Note that the uapi/* header is a copy from the
> > kernel header, and it means that we'll change the same for the kernel,
> > too.

> It's absolutely 100% compatible by design.
> I was planning to update the kernel uapi header to align changes, but the
> volume of code is much lower on the alsa-lib side. Will resubmit with the
> preferred provider/consumer wording.

It's binary compatible but it'd break the build for any existing code
using the UAPI headers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20200908/f35e9d1e/attachment.sig>