[alsa-devel] [PATCH 01/23] ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm:dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()

[Amadeusz Sławiński]

On 27 Jun 2019 11:00:01 +0900
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com> wrote:

> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
> 
> We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register,
> let's use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c
> b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c index 042e593..9abf072 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c
> @@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ static const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config
> atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config = { 
>  int atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	return snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev,
> &atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config, 0);
> +	return devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev,
> +					&atmel_dmaengine_pcm_config,
> 0); }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(atmel_pcm_dma_platform_register);
>  
>  void atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister(dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(atmel_pcm_dma_platform_unregister);
>  

Do we need to keep empty function?