[alsa-devel] [PATCH] sound: pci: emu10k1: Remove unneeded variable "change"

Wasko, Michal michal.wasko at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 12 10:06:23 CEST 2019


On 7/11/2019 7:17 PM, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> fix below issue reported by coccicheck
> sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c:1077:5-11: Unneeded variable: "change".
> Return "0" on line 1092
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam at gmail.com>
Since the  function always return 0 and you perform code clean-up then
maybe it would be a good idea to just change function to void instead
of returning int value which does not seem to have use.

Michal W.
> ---
>   sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> index 67d6473..9cf8183 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,6 @@ static int snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>   {
>   	struct emu10k1x *emu = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
>   	unsigned int val;
> -	int change = 0;
>   
>   	val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] ;
>   
> @@ -1089,7 +1088,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>   		snd_emu10k1x_ptr_write(emu, ROUTING, 0, 0x1003F);
>   		snd_emu10k1x_gpio_write(emu, 0x1080);
>   	}
> -	return change;
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif =


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list