[alsa-devel] [PATCH] sound: pci: emu10k1: Remove unneeded variable "change"
Wasko, Michal
michal.wasko at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 12 10:06:23 CEST 2019
On 7/11/2019 7:17 PM, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> fix below issue reported by coccicheck
> sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c:1077:5-11: Unneeded variable: "change".
> Return "0" on line 1092
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam at gmail.com>
Since the function always return 0 and you perform code clean-up then
maybe it would be a good idea to just change function to void instead
of returning int value which does not seem to have use.
Michal W.
> ---
> sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> index 67d6473..9cf8183 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1x.c
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,6 @@ static int snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> {
> struct emu10k1x *emu = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
> unsigned int val;
> - int change = 0;
>
> val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] ;
>
> @@ -1089,7 +1088,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> snd_emu10k1x_ptr_write(emu, ROUTING, 0, 0x1003F);
> snd_emu10k1x_gpio_write(emu, 0x1080);
> }
> - return change;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_emu10k1x_shared_spdif =
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list