[alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 03/17] soundwire: rename drv_to_sdw_slave_driver macro

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 12/27/19 1:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 17-12-19, 15:03, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> Align with previous renames and shorten macro
>>
>> No functionality change
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c       | 9 ++++-----
>>   include/linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h | 3 ++-
>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> index c0585bcc8a41..2b2830b622fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv)
>>   static int sdw_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *ddrv)
>>   {
>>   	struct sdw_slave *slave = to_sdw_slave_device(dev);
>> -	struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);
>> +	struct sdw_driver *drv = to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);
> 
> so patch 1 does:
> 
> -       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_driver(dev->driver);
> +       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(dev->driver);
> 
> and here we move drv_to_sdw_slave_driver to to_sdw_slave_driver... why
> not do this in first patch and save step1... or did i miss something??

because patch1 introduces replaces 'sdw_' by 'sdw_slave_' in several 
places, not just for drv_to_sdw_driver()

I can squash all these patches if you want to but then you'll tell me 
one step at a time...