[alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 03/17] soundwire: rename drv_to_sdw_slave_driver macro

[Vinod Koul]

On 17-12-19, 15:03, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Align with previous renames and shorten macro
> 
> No functionality change
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c       | 9 ++++-----
>  include/linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
> index c0585bcc8a41..2b2830b622fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv)
>  static int sdw_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *ddrv)
>  {
>  	struct sdw_slave *slave = to_sdw_slave_device(dev);
> -	struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);
> +	struct sdw_driver *drv = to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);

so patch 1 does:

-       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_driver(dev->driver);
+       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(dev->driver);

and here we move drv_to_sdw_slave_driver to to_sdw_slave_driver... why
not do this in first patch and save step1... or did i miss something??

-- 
~Vinod