[alsa-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add an I2S mux clock

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-31 07:20:57)
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:25 AM, Codrin Ciubotariu
>> <codrin.ciubotariu at microchip.com> wrote:
>> > On 31.05.2018 03:58, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:34:22PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The I2S mux clock can be used to select the I2S input clock. The
>> >>> available parents are the peripheral and the generated clocks.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu at microchip.com>
>> >>> ---
>> >>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt       | 34
>> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>> >>>
>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt
>> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt
>> >>> index 51c259a..1c46b3c 100644
>> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt
>> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/at91-clock.txt
>> >>> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ Required properties:
>> >>>         "atmel,sama5d2-clk-audio-pll-pmc"
>> >>>                 at91 audio pll output on AUDIOPLLCLK that feeds the PMC
>> >>>                 and can be used by peripheral clock or generic clock
>> >>> +       "atmel,sama5d2-clk-i2s-mux":
>> >>> +               at91 I2S clock source selection
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Is this boolean or takes some values. If latter, what are valid values?
>> >
>> >
>> > This is the compatible string of the clock driver.
>>
>> Ah, now I remember. AT91 uses fine grained clock nodes in DT. Is there
>> still a plan to fix this?
>
> I'm also interested in a plan.
>
>> >>
>> >>> +               compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-clk-i2s-mux";
>> >>> +               #address-cells = <1>;
>> >>> +               #size-cells = <0>;
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> How do you address this block? My guess is you don't because it is just
>> >> part of some other block and you are just creating this node to
>> >> instantiate a driver. Just make the node for the actual h/w block a
>> >> clock provider and define the clock ids (0 and 1).
>> >
>> >
>> > This block is not addressed, but its children are. The register we access in
>> > this driver is not part of other block. It's a SFR register, accessed
>> > through syscon and it has nothing to do with the I2S IP (see SAMA5D2 DS,
>> > page 1256, fig. 44-1: I2SC Block Diagram) that is the consumer of this
>> > clock. Adding a clock-id property in the I2S node would be just like v3 of
>> > this series, with the difference that we use clock-id instead of alias id to
>> > set the clock parent, which is not how you suggested back then.
>>
>> I wasn't suggesting a clock-id property, but a clock specifier (i.e.
>> make #clock-cells 1).
>>
>> But AT91 clocks are all a mess, so I don't know what to tell you.
>>
>
> If #clock-cells of 1 works then we should go with that. It's still weird
> that we need random nodes to add more clks, but I guess that's how it's
> going to be for each at91 clk driver until it changes to be one big
> provider node.

Seems to me that clock additions could use a new binding and we start
with a new driver that handles these few clocks initially. But I
haven't looked whether both can coexist.

Rob