[alsa-devel] [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: wm8994: Mark expected switch fall-through
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Aug 6 13:34:26 CEST 2018
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:55:18PM -0400, valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:56:12 -0500, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" said:
> > On 08/03/2018 11:45 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Basically nobody ever uses OPCLK so I'd be susprised if anyone ever
> > > noticed.
> I wonder if nobody uses it because any attempts to do so get an error? :)
No, nobody ever physically wires up an OPCLK. If one was there it'd be
unavoidable.
> > I see. I wonder what's the best approach in this case. Should that code be
> > removed instead of 'fixed'?
> I'm thinking that's a spot that needs a 'break;' added.
Yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20180806/69b4a3ef/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list