[alsa-devel] [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: wm8994: Mark expected switch fall-through

valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Fri Aug 3 19:55:18 CEST 2018


On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:56:12 -0500, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" said:
> On 08/03/2018 11:45 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Basically nobody ever uses OPCLK so I'd be susprised if anyone ever
> > noticed.

I wonder if nobody uses it because any attempts to do so get an error? :)

> I see. I wonder what's the best approach in this case. Should that code be
> removed instead of 'fixed'?

I'm thinking that's a spot that needs a 'break;' added.

Of course, my understanding of that code is limited to looking at the first 10
patches and the fall-through hit something reasonable, and then the last
one did a fall-through to an error return.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20180803/eff998b9/attachment.sig>


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list