[alsa-devel] [RFC 1/2] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:15:25PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

> One possible thing to do is to let structure definitions to be
> available for non-ACPI builds. Then compiler won't fail on structure
> access which will be anyway optimized away by later compiler stages.

You could also have inline accessor functions which can be stubbed out
when not needed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20131028/58bf4d50/attachment.sig>