[alsa-devel] [RFC 1/2] i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves

Jarkko Nikula jarkko.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 28 14:15:25 CET 2013


Hi Rafael

On 10/25/2013 05:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 25, 2013  04:30:23 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote:
 >>>
 >> Hmm, not only. Referencing to dev field in struct acpi_device by
 >> dev_name(&adev->dev) here will fail too.
 >
 > Well, something is not quite right here.
 >
 > One of the *reasons* for having ACPI_HANDLE() defined this way is to
 > avoid using explicit CONFIG_ACPI checks, so if that doesn't work,
 > then all of that becomes a bit pointless.
 >
One possible thing to do is to let structure definitions to be available 
for non-ACPI builds. Then compiler won't fail on structure access which 
will be anyway optimized away by later compiler stages.

With a quick test below vmlinux section sizes don't change for couple 
non-ACPI build tests and allow to get rid off IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) 
test in this patch. It's very minimal as it only moves the CONFIG_ACPI 
test just after the struct acpi_device definition and defines 
acpi_bus_get_device for non-ACPI case.

What I don't know how consistent it is as there are still couple 
structure definitions under CONFIG_ACPI, doesn't touch other acpi 
headers and requires to include acpi_bus.h in driver (or move acpi_bus.h 
include in linux/acpi.h currently under CONFIG_ACPI).

-- 
Jarkko

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index d901982..7ab7870 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
  bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
  bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);

-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-
  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>

  #define ACPI_BUS_FILE_ROOT    "acpi"
@@ -314,6 +312,8 @@ struct acpi_device {
      void (*remove)(struct acpi_device *);
  };

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+
  static inline void *acpi_driver_data(struct acpi_device *d)
  {
      return d->driver_data;
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct 
acpi_device *adev)

  static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
  static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
+static inline int acpi_bus_get_device(acpi_handle handle,
+                      struct acpi_device **device) { return 0; }

  #endif                /* CONFIG_ACPI */



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list