[alsa-devel] [RFC] ALSA: add new alsa control byte extended

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:10:43AM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:

> driver). But if these large data are static and they are not expected to
> be saved (alsactl), the control API may be extended using a new ioctl or
> the hwdep interface with some custom tools may be used.

I'd expect them to be handleable with standard tools, from a user
perspective these things are just another setting that gets applied when
changing use case like volumes and routing so manipulating the settings
in a separate place seems wrong - at the level where you're applying
them it's all part of the same set of data.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20131129/af89c784/attachment.sig>