Hi all,
I thought I'd brain-dump my thoughts on VCO support. It's not as coherent as I'd like it to be, but it's important I get it out there as the mini summit is only a few days away.
Linn use-case -------------
We make network media players, and support synchronised playback where a master device sends audio to several slave devices for simultaneous rendering.
On a given network there may be several masters, each coordinating several slaves. These masters might be recovering their clocks from one of many different types of external source: SPDIF or internet radio, for example.
By keeping the audio clocks synchronised using an appropriate network protocol, we can achieve simultaneous playback across many devices, which enable simultaneous start, and no drift.
Network devices can be dynamically configured as master/slave, and therefore must dynamically subscribe/unsubscribe to/from any master as appropriate. Incidentally, we use our own UPnP services to make this happen.
Our hardware ------------
Our SoC of choice has an event timer, a notion of an event clock. This allows signals from peripherals to be timestamped in hardware, and for signals from the event module to be raised at peripherals using compare registers. Think of it as a capture/compare module with multiple capture channels and compare registers for almost all peripherals.
To get synchronised start, We intend to drive the event timer using a VCO, and trigger our I2S module (with preloaded output fifo) using the appropriate compare register in the event module.
Handwaving ----------
There are two use cases that are of interest here: VCO and PTP. The pure VCO model implies that the PCM driver *owns* the VCO. The PTP model implies that the PCM is a slave to a PTP clock, governed elsewhere.
As our SoC event clock is system-wide, other drivers/processes may be timestamping using this clock. Therefore this proposal seeks to address the PTP model (PCM doesn't own VCO).
The Linux kernel provides a kernel framework for supporting VCO-based clocks, the PCH framework, which exposes such clocks to userspace with a common API. This API isn't PTP-specific however, and would allow for other synchronisation mechanisms.
The kernel refers to these as 'ptp' clocks, so I'll use PTP from here on in: This doesn't imply IEEE-1588 however.
Takashi added support for the selection of timestamp type at runtime. These types currently correspond to posix clock types, and don't allow for other time-sources such as PTP clocks.
I imagine that PCM modules should be able to advertise their supported timestamp types: In our case, our driver would additionally advertise some unique PTP clock.
It would be ideal if we could uniquely identify a PTP clock using a posix clockid_t, the value of which could be meaningfully shared amongst userspace processes, for example over D-Bus. However it's not immediately clear that you can establish such a value. So for now let's design as though we can't.
Unique clocks from userspace might be represented as some tuple of a _clock protocol_ (e.g. POSIX, PTP), and a _clock id_ that represents a specific clock (e.g. CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_REALTIME, "/dev/ptp0"). I'll admit that a path to a device node is not ideal, but you get the idea: It's a conversation starter. Maybe major/minor number would be better. Either way, kernel-side ALSA must be able to timestamp using the information.
Takashi's work presumes that the clock protocol is posix: I would advocate for allowing other protocols. No surprise there :)
Timestamp Clock Enumeration ---------------------------
PCM devices could be probed for supported timestamps. Some enumeration mechanism, akin to snd_pcm_query_chmaps_from_hw(), could return an array of snd_pcm_clock_descriptor_t*, as in:
typedef struct _snd_pcm_clock_descriptor { /* enum indicating type of chewy center */ snd_pcm_clock_protocol_t protocol; union { /* Essentially a clockid_t */ struct snd_pcm_clock_posix *posix_data; /* Perhaps "/dev/ptp0", or a major/minor number. */ struct snd_pcm_clock_ptp *ptp_data; } id; } snd_pcm_clock_descriptor_t;
A revised version of Takashi's snd_pcm_sw_params_set_tstamp_type() would take a snd_pcm_clock_descriptor_t*. This allows for existing posix clock types, PTP clock types, and allows further clock types without an API (ABI?) change.
Summary -------
This document focuses on using a VCO as the output clock for a PCM device, and hints at userspace API amendments that would support such a configuration. It mentions:
- Allowing the timestamp type to support other clock protocols - PCM devices can be probed for a list of supported clock protocol/id tuples. - These tuples are sufficient to uniquely identify clocks from userspace. - Proposal scales to multiple PTP clocks, with no implied relationship to the system clock.
It doesn't attempt to tackle configurations where the VCO is owned by the PCM hardware: In this case, I would advocate for using the PTP interface anyway, rather than adding an ALSA API for controlling the VCO.
Any comments and feedback would be very welcome.
Cheers, Tim