Michal Simek monstr@monstr.eu writes:
Hi Michael,
On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote:
On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com writes:
On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com writes: > Hi, > > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > platforms. Here is the thread about it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa2e8@xili... > > I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense > to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > > U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10... > > Based on current ppc/next. > > If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know.
Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it.
I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, especially given people are distracted at the moment.
I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections.
Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same.
If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer.
It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as well, it's already been acked.
Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms.
Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail.
I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be in v5.8.
Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in.
I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well.
cheers