Hi Mark,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 04:34:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 05:17:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:26:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
To be honest it's surprising that we'd have to manually specify this, I would expect to be able to reparent. I suspect it'd be better to go the other way here and allow reparenting.
Yeah, I think I'd prefer to allow reparenting too, but as can be seen from the other reviewers in that thread, it seems like we have a very split community here, so that doesn't sound very realistic without some major pushback :)
For these ASoC drivers I think we should just do the reparenting, they're very much at the leaf of the tree so the considerations that make it a problem sometimes are unlikely to apply.
I'd still prefer to remain conservative on this series and try not to change the behaviour in it. It's pretty massive already, I'd like to avoid tracking regressions left and right :)
Would sending a subsequent series that would do this acceptable for you?
Maxime