At Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:02:51 +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
It won't happen in reality. And, initializing to some random values isn't always received good. You can use uninitialized_var() in such a case, too.
Takashi
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se
sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c b/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c index 21b373b..788a31c 100644 --- a/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c +++ b/sound/pci/ice1712/wm8766.c @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int snd_wm8766_ctl_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, { struct snd_wm8766 *wm = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); int n = kcontrol->private_value;
- u16 val1, val2;
u16 val1 = 0, val2 = 0;
if (wm->ctl[n].get) wm->ctl[n].get(wm, &val1, &val2);
-- 1.7.10.4