Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400 Jeff Garzik jeff@garzik.org wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ storm
Why does the driver report "irq 0"?
ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0 <====
Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20
Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ values wrongly ?
AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ. Please point out examples where it remains broken...
2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree.
I've seen the patch that eventually became 22888423b3b1b96573250671afb5b72ea4364902 from Olof Johansson but nothing from Tejun on the subject.
Jeff