[Sound-open-firmware] Inclusive terminology in SOF

Jankowski, Janusz janusz.jankowski at linux.intel.com
Mon Aug 31 12:19:57 CEST 2020


Hi Ranjani,

I've started related discussion on GH: 
https://github.com/orgs/thesofproject/teams/sof-developers/discussions/42

Thanks,

Janusz

On 8/26/2020 1:03 AM, Sridharan, Ranjani wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently, Linux kernel and other Open-Source software have been making
> changes to replace non-inclusive terminologies as in [1]. I was
> wondering if there are plans for SOF to follow suit as well.
>
> Particularly, I am looking for guidance on the multi-core terminology
> to replace the usage of master/slave cores with maybe primary/secondary
> cores or something along those lines.
>
> There are other instances related to SSP/SPI where we use similar
> terminology but that likely needs wider approval/acceptance.
>
> Appreciate your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Ranjani
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/4/229
> _______________________________________________
> Sound-open-firmware mailing list
> Sound-open-firmware at alsa-project.org
> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/sound-open-firmware


More information about the Sound-open-firmware mailing list