[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: x86: Ensure VLV bitwise operations are SOC specific

Ian W MORRISON ianwmorrison at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 00:49:17 CET 2017


On 11 February 2017 at 09:54, Pierre-Louis Bossart <
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 2/9/17 9:33 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote:
>
>> The function vlv_display_irq_postinstall is used by both valleyview
>> and cherryview irq handling. I915_LPE_PIPE_C_INTERRUPT is specific
>> to cherryview so should be excluded from any valleyview associated
>> bitwise operations.
>>
>
> it's a write indeed to a field that isn't defined but there is no matching
> read or action taken as a result of a write of that field. Does this solve
> a real problem or is this more to make the code more consistent?
>
>
Certainly the later and only to the point of removing any opportunities for
problems to exist for the former. In trying to diagnose the '*ERROR* Atomic
update failure on pipe X' messages in 'dmesg' it was more of a straw grasp.


>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison <linuxium at linuxium.com.au
>> <mailto:linuxium at linuxium.com.au>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index f0880af..ee61808 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -2940,9 +2940,10 @@ static void vlv_display_irq_postinstall(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>>         WARN_ON(dev_priv->irq_mask != ~0);
>>
>> -       val = (I915_LPE_PIPE_A_INTERRUPT |
>> -               I915_LPE_PIPE_B_INTERRUPT |
>> -               I915_LPE_PIPE_C_INTERRUPT);
>> +       val = I915_LPE_PIPE_A_INTERRUPT |
>> +               I915_LPE_PIPE_B_INTERRUPT;
>> +       if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> +               val |= I915_LPE_PIPE_C_INTERRUPT;
>>
>>         enable_mask |= val;
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
>


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list