[alsa-devel] [PATCH] dt-bindings: ASoC: rsnd: Add device tree support for r8a774[35]

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:34:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> The confusing part here is that for most[*] subsystems, patches touching
> only DT bindings should have a "dt-bindings" prefix, while patches touching
> both DT bindings and driver code should have the drivers' subsystem prefix.

> [*] I think you're about the only maintainer who insists on patches touching
> only DT bindings having the drivers' subsystem prefix, which people tend to
> forget, if they're even aware of that rule...

> Can we improve this?

This is something Rob's been pushing which seems like a step back to me
so I've been pushing back on it - it's causing problems for me spotting
things I need to look at and later on in review (including my scripting,
which does pay attention to subject lines).  I suspect I'm at the upper
end of people getting lots of irrelevant stuff in copy which doesn't
help here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20171213/21355b46/attachment.sig>