[alsa-devel] [RFC 01/10] ASoC: Intel: Boards: Machine driver for Intel platforms

[Ughreja, Rakesh A]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Koul, Vinod
>Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:48 PM
>To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Ughreja, Rakesh A <rakesh.a.ughreja at intel.com>; alsa-devel at alsa-project.org;
>broonie at kernel.org; tiwai at suse.de; liam.r.girdwood at linux.intel.com; Patches
>Audio <patches.audio at intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC 01/10] ASoC: Intel: Boards: Machine driver for Intel
>platforms
>
>On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> On 12/4/17 9:10 AM, Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
>
>> >>>>>    sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig           |  10 ++
>> >>>>>    sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile          |   2 +
>> >>>>>    sound/soc/intel/boards/skl_hda_generic.c | 276
>> >>>>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>>
>> >>>>can we drop the Skylake reference? It's become a catch-all term to mean
>> >>>>both the platform, the IP and the driver.
>> >>>
>> >>>Suggest some name. I have no problem.
>> >>
>> >>HiFi3 ?
>> >>iDisp ?
>> >>HDAudio-DSP ?
>> >
>> >hda_dsp_generic.c -- For the main file
>> >hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions
>> >
>> >Does it look fine ?
>>
>> works for me.
>
>Sorry not for me. hda_dsp_xxx doesnt tie it to anything. HDA and DSP are too
>generic terms. But yes I don't have a better alternate than skl_generic.
>Here this solution is tied to a very specfic IP which is present in SKL
>onwards platforms..
>
>Yes SKL is become an IP as well as platform. Maybe we should have a codename
>for this like azx :)

We do have a code name "sst".

So does this sound okay for you ?

sst_hda_dsp_generic.c -- For main file
sst_hda_dsp_common.c -- for common functions

Regards,
Rakesh

>
>--
>~Vinod