[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: TLV320AIC23B Support more sample rates

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:35:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > +		return score;

> > +	return 0xffffffff;

> -1 would be simpler and safer (for possible missing f's).

I'm not sure that'd add to the clarity - the goal isn't to have all bits
set, the goal is to have a much larger score than could ever otherwise
be achieved so putting in a very large constant expresses that much more
directly.