[Sound-open-firmware] [PATCH 06/15] [RFC][v2]DMIC: Add SOF DMIC trace definitions

[Seppo Ingalsuo]

On 07.05.2018 14:20, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 18:01 +0300, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Seppo Ingalsuo <seppo.ingalsuo at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   src/include/sof/trace.h | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/include/sof/trace.h b/src/include/sof/trace.h
>> index 5409a1f..2fd77fe 100644
>> --- a/src/include/sof/trace.h
>> +++ b/src/include/sof/trace.h
>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
>>   #define TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM_IPC		(TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM + 0x170)
>>   #define TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM_DMA		(TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM + 0x180)
>>   #define TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM_SSP		(TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM + 0x190)
>> -
>> +#define TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM_DMIC	(TRACE_BOOT_PLATFORM + 0x1a0)
>>   
>>   /* trace event classes - high 8 bits*/
>>   #define TRACE_CLASS_IRQ		(1 << 24)
>> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
>>   #define TRACE_CLASS_EQ_FIR      (19 << 24)
>>   #define TRACE_CLASS_EQ_IIR      (20 << 24)
>>   #define TRACE_CLASS_SA		(21 << 24)
>> +#define TRACE_CLASS_DMIC	(22 << 24)
>>   
> oh, we should really export trace types to a uapi header (trace.h ?) that rmbox
> can include.

Should I do a generic patch for all TRACE_CLASS first (without DMIC 
stuff)? And should the TRACE_BOOT definitions be there too?

Thanks,
Seppo

>
> Liam
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sound-open-firmware mailing list
> Sound-open-firmware at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/sound-open-firmware
>