[PATCH v4 0/7] kselftest/alsa: pcm-test improvements

[Takashi Iwai]

On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 18:06:46 +0100,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> This series provides a bunch of quick updates which should make the
> coverage from pcm-test a bit more useful, it adds some support for
> skipping tests when the hardware/driver is unable to support the
> requested configuration, support for providing user visible descriptions
> and then expands the set of cases we cover to include more sample rates
> and channel counts.  This should exercise switching between 8kHz and
> 44.1kHz based rates and ensure that clocking doesn't get confused by
> non-stereo channel counts, both of which are I expect common real world
> errors, at least for embedded cards.
> 
> v4:
>  - Rebase onto v6.2-rc1.
> v3:
>  - "Rebase" onto Takashi's current tree (with a revert).
>  - Include Jaroslav's changes to specify all tests in the configuration
>    file parsing.
>  - Add a new "description" field to the configuration instead of trying
>    to name the tests.
>  - Always run both default and per-system tests, logging our success at
>    setting the per-system configurations as a separate test since they
>    shouldn't fail.
> v2:
>  - Rebase onto Takashi's current tree.
>  - Tweak the buffer sizes for the newly added cases, don't be quite
>    so ambitious in how big a buffer we request for 96kHz and don't
>    go quite so small for 8kHz since some devices start hitting lower
>    limits on period size and struggle to deliver accurate timing.
> 
> To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.com>
> To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex at perex.cz>
> To: Shuah Khan <shuah at kernel.org>
> Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> Cc: linux-kselftest at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>

Applied all patches now to for-next branch.


thanks,

Takashi