[PATCH v1] Fix: SYNCOBJ TIMELINE Test failed.
Das, Nirmoy
nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 30 09:01:47 CEST 2022
On 6/29/2022 11:12 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 29.06.22 um 08:02 schrieb jie1zhan:
>> The issue cause by the commit :
>>
>> 721255b527(drm/syncobj: flatten dma_fence_chains on transfer).
>>
>> Because it use the point of dma_fence incorrectly
>>
>> Correct the point of dma_fence by fence array
>
> Well that patch is just utterly nonsense as far as I can see.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: jie1zhan <jesse.zhang at amd.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com>
>
> I have strong doubts that Nirmoy has reviewed this and I certainly
> haven't reviewed it.
I haven't reviewed this either.
Nirmoy
>
> Christian.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> index 7e48dcd1bee4..d5db818f1c76 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int drm_syncobj_flatten_chain(struct
>> dma_fence **f)
>> goto free_fences;
>> dma_fence_put(*f);
>> - *f = &array->base;
>> + *f = array->fences[0];
>> return 0;
>> free_fences:
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list