[PATCH] ASoC: qcom: q6dsp: Fix an off-by-one in q6adm_alloc_copp()
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at oracle.com
Fri Jul 22 08:30:22 CEST 2022
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 01:47:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> (Still takes overnight to run so I might end up sorely dissappointed
> and defeated tomorrow morning)
The generic test was pretty useless. :( Basically it was 117 false
positives. Attached.
There were thre main reasons for the false postives.
1) Smatch takes short cuts when dealing with loops.
2) Smatch doesn't understand threads so some code does.
msg.code = 0;
write_msg_and_wait_for_response(&msg);
return msg.code;
It's kind of useful to find these bugs in Smatch and I'll investigate
how to fix them. Another option would be to hack around the bugs by
just ignoring 0 and 1 returns.
if (rl_max(left_rl).value == 0 || rl_max(left_rl).value == 1)
return;
That would probably silence 90% of the false positives caused by 1 and
2.
3) A lot of code has harmless sanity checks:
size = get_size();
if (size > MAX)
return -EINVAL;
or:
size = get_size();
if (size > MAX)
size = MAX;
defeated. :(
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list