[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5] update tas2780.yaml

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:44 PM Xu, Yang <raphael-xu at ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> One more question of tas27xx.yaml.Would you like us to delete tas27xx.yaml and submit new tas2764.yaml in updated format,or we just revert to old version tas2764.yaml commit?
> Thanks.

I think tas2770.yaml and tas2780.yaml should both be removed with
ti,tas2770 compatible added to tas27xx.yaml.

>
> Regards
> Raphael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Yang <>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 11:48 AM
> To: 'Rob Herring' <robh at kernel.org>; Raphael-Xu <13691752556 at 139.com>
> Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; Ding, Shenghao <shenghao-ding at ti.com>; Navada Kanyana, Mukund <navada at ti.com>; Syrus, Andy <asyrus at ti.com>; broonie at kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5] update tas2780.yaml
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Please see my reply.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 10:52 PM
> To: Raphael-Xu <13691752556 at 139.com>
> Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; Xu, Yang <raphael-xu at ti.com>; Ding, Shenghao <shenghao-ding at ti.com>; Navada Kanyana, Mukund <navada at ti.com>; Syrus, Andy <asyrus at ti.com>; broonie at kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5] update tas2780.yaml
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:08:57PM +0800, Raphael-Xu wrote:
> > 1.remove unused item in DT 2.revise the format
>
> Again, fix your subject. Run 'git log --oneline Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/' for inspiration of the format of the subject.
> [RX]:just submit new patch

Closer, but still the wrong subject. You are missing spaces.

> However, there's a bigger issue here. We already have a binding for this device. It's in tas27xx.yaml. And you added 2780 to it, so why did you add another schema? (All the same issues in that patch too. wrong subject, broken schema. So you haven't learned.) [RX]:We will follow tas2780 patch format and submit separate patch if you think tas2780 patch is acceptable.
> And then there is also tas2770.yaml which appears to be about the same as well.
> [RX]:We will follow tas2780 patch format and submit separate patch if you think tas2780 patch is acceptable.

Is deleting tas2780.yaml and just adding ti,tas2780 compatible not
sufficient? Why fix tas2780.yaml and then delete it? Doing the same
for tas2770 can be separate.

Rob

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael-Xu <13691752556 at 139.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2780.yaml    | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)