[PATCH] docs: driver-api: firmware: add driver firmware guidelines.
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Tue Jul 19 00:04:14 CEST 2022
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:33:11 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > If the hardware isn't
> > + enabled by default or under development,
>
> Wondering if it might be better to drop the "or under development", as
> the "enabled by default" is the main part afaics. Maybe something like
> "If support for the hardware is normally inactive (e.g. has to be
> enabled manually by a kernel parameter)" would be better anyway.
It's a tricky one, I'd say something like you can break the FW ABI
"until HW becomes available for public consumption" or such.
I'm guessing what we're after is letting people break the compatibility
in early stages of the product development cycles. Pre-silicon and
bring up, but not after there are products on the market?
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list