[PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: Remove condition with no effect

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 08/07/22 12:19, Jiaxin Yu ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto:
>>> From: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun at coolpad.com>
>>>
>>> Remove condition with no effect
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan <tanzhongjun at coolpad.com>
>>> ---
>>>    sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 --
>>>    1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
>>> b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
>>> index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644
>>> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
>>> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c
>>> @@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct
>>> snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>>>    	case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
>>>    		if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
>>> MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2)
>>>    			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
>>> 0x39);
>>> -		else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==
>>> MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2)
>>> -			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
>>> 0x31);
>>
>> I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a
>> typo here?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Angelo
>>
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this
> code is not concise enough.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jiaxin.Yu

Thank you for the clarification. In this case:

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>

Cheers!

> 
>>>    		else
>>>    			regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,
>>> 0x31);
>>>    		break;
>>
>>
>