[bug report] soundwire: qcom: Check device status before reading devid
Srinivas Kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Fri Jul 8 10:31:31 CEST 2022
Hi Dan,
On 08/07/2022 09:08, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Srinivas Kandagatla,
>
> The patch aa1262ca6695: "soundwire: qcom: Check device status before
> reading devid" from Jul 6, 2022, leads to the following Smatch static
> checker warning:
>
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:484 qcom_swrm_enumerate()
> error: buffer overflow 'ctrl->status' 11 <= 11
>
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> 471 static int qcom_swrm_enumerate(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> 472 {
> 473 struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> 474 struct sdw_slave *slave, *_s;
> 475 struct sdw_slave_id id;
> 476 u32 val1, val2;
> 477 bool found;
> 478 u64 addr;
> 479 int i;
> 480 char *buf1 = (char *)&val1, *buf2 = (char *)&val2;
> 481
> 482 for (i = 1; i <= SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
> ^^^^^
> This a loop that starts from 1 instead of 0. I looked at the
> surrounding context and it seems like it should be a normal loop that
> starts at 0 and goes to < SDW_MAX_DEVICES.
>
In SoundWire world device id 0 is special one and used for enumerating
the SoundWire devices.
Only addresses from 1-11 are valid devids that can be assigned to
devices by the host/controller.
This part of the code is reading the devids assigned by the hw
auto-enumeration, So the loop start from 1 is correct here.
> (Or possibly the other loops are buggy as well).
Atleast this code is fine, but I see other places where are starting
from 0 which could be fixed but the SoundWire core will ignore the
status for devid 0.
--srini
>
> 483 /* do not continue if the status is Not Present */
> --> 484 if (!ctrl->status[i])
>
> So this is off by one and reads one element beyond the end of the loop.
>
> 485 continue;
> 486
> 487 /*SCP_Devid5 - Devid 4*/
> 488 ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_SLAVE_DEV_ID_1(i), &val1);
> 489
> 490 /*SCP_Devid3 - DevId 2 Devid 1 Devid 0*/
> 491 ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_ENUMERATOR_SLAVE_DEV_ID_2(i), &val2);
> 492
> 493 if (!val1 && !val2)
> 494 break;
> 495
> 496 addr = buf2[1] | (buf2[0] << 8) | (buf1[3] << 16) |
> 497 ((u64)buf1[2] << 24) | ((u64)buf1[1] << 32) |
> 498 ((u64)buf1[0] << 40);
> 499
> 500 sdw_extract_slave_id(bus, addr, &id);
> 501 found = false;
> 502 /* Now compare with entries */
> 503 list_for_each_entry_safe(slave, _s, &bus->slaves, node) {
> 504 if (sdw_compare_devid(slave, id) == 0) {
> 505 qcom_swrm_set_slave_dev_num(bus, slave, i);
> 506 found = true;
> 507 break;
> 508 }
> 509 }
> 510
> 511 if (!found) {
> 512 qcom_swrm_set_slave_dev_num(bus, NULL, i);
> 513 sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, NULL);
> 514 }
> 515 }
> 516
> 517 complete(&ctrl->enumeration);
> 518 return 0;
> 519 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list