[RFC 00/37] ASoC: Intel: AVS - Audio DSP for cAVS

[Cezary Rojewski]

On 2022-01-06 2:39 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote:

...

> Your comments and review is much appreciated. While we did separate the 
> series into chunks, I'm keen to agree we could have moved a little bit 
> further with the separation. Below you'll find the list of patches and 
> my thoughts after taking your feedback into consideration. There's also 
> a TLDR if there's not enough coffee in the pot to cover the summary.

...

> TLDR:
> Separate series #1:
>    1/37 ALSA: hda: Add snd_hdac_ext_bus_link_at() helper
>    2/37 ALSA: hda: Update and expose snd_hda_codec_device_init()
>    3/37 ALSA: hda: Update and expose codec register procedures
>    4/37 ALSA: hda: Expose codec cleanup and power-save functions
>    6/37 ASoC: Export DAI register and widget ctor and dctor functions
> 
> Separate series #2:
>    <everything else not listed here>
> 
>    Note: patches 21-24/37 get reordered to prepend topology and path 
> management (currently, patches 18/37 and 19/37 respectively). While 
> right now I don't see a reason for doing so, this also provides a 
> possibility for separation or division of these last two mentioned 
> patches if need be.
> 
> Separate series #3:
>    20/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: Conditional-path support
>    29/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: Coredump and recovery flow
>    30/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: Prepare for firmware tracing
>    31/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: D0ix power state support
>    32/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: Event tracing
>    33/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: Machine board registration
>    36/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: SKL-based platforms support
>    37/37 ASoC: Intel: avs: APL-based platforms support
> 
> The last three could be separated too as all of them touch on isolated 
> subject: recognize ID: XXX to support YYY.

Hello,

Is the proposal described in my previous message acceptable on your end 
Mark?


Regards,
Czarek