[PATCH 06/17] ASoC: Intel: avs: Add pipeline management requests
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Fri Feb 25 21:42:15 CET 2022
On 2/25/22 12:31, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2022-02-25 2:11 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> On 2/7/22 06:20, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
>>> A 'Pipeline' represents both a container of module instances, and a
>>> scheduling entity. Multiple pipelines can be bound together to create an
>>> audio graph. The Pipeline state machine is entirely controlled by IPCs
>>> (creation, deletion and state changes).
>>
>> How are the module instances connected within a pipeline? You've said
>> too much or too little here.
>
>
> Hmm.. I doubt commit messages is the place to bring up entire FW
> specification. A high level description is provided to give a
> maintainer/reviewer idea of what the pipeline is. Perhaps s/module
> instances/modules/ would suffice.
No one is asking you to to provide the entire specification, just enough
for reviewers with no access to that spec to understand what your intent is.
>
>>> +int avs_ipc_create_pipeline(struct avs_dev *adev, u16 req_size, u8
>>> priority,
>>> + u8 instance_id, bool lp, u16 attributes)
>>> +{
>>> + union avs_global_msg msg = AVS_GLOBAL_REQUEST(CREATE_PIPELINE);
>>> + struct avs_ipc_msg request = {0};
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + msg.create_ppl.ppl_mem_size = req_size;
>>> + msg.create_ppl.ppl_priority = priority;
>>> + msg.create_ppl.instance_id = instance_id;
>>> + msg.ext.create_ppl.lp = lp;
>>
>> you may want to describe what the concepts of 'priority', 'lp' and
>> 'attributes' are and which entity defines the values (topology?)
>
>
> These fields match firmware equivalents 1:1 and are part of pipeline
> descriptor excepted by firmware when initializing a pipeline. Handlers
> found in messages.c are responsible for one and only one task only:
> sending a concrete message. Part of the driver that implements PCM
> operations (not part of this series) cares about the topology (where
> these values actually come from) and invokes the necessary IPCs.
add a comment then that the driver is just relaying information found in
the topology to the firmware.
>>> +/* Pipeline management messages */
>>> +enum avs_pipeline_state {
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_INVALID,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_UNINITIALIZED,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_RESET,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_PAUSED,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_RUNNING,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_EOS,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_ERROR_STOP,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_SAVED,
>>> + AVS_PPL_STATE_RESTORED,
>>
>> can you describe that the last two enums might entail and what the
>> purpose might be?
>>
>> I can see how the firmware state could be saved in IMR for faster
>> suspend/resume, but save/restore at the pipeline level doesn't seem to
>> have an obvious match for an ASoC driver?
>
>
> The enum lists all available pipeline states. We're planning to move
> these to uapi later on to allow apps to monitor running pipelines states
> real-time.
That doesn't answer to my question. You are not using the last two in
the rest of this patchset, so why create doubt in the confused brain on
the reviewer?
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list