[PATCH 06/11] ASoC: dt-bindings: ti,pcm3168a: Convert to json-schema
Péter Ujfalusi
peter.ujfalusi at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 16:34:42 CET 2022
Hi Geert,
On 19/12/2022 10:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Oops, Peter is no longer at TI...
Yup.
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> CC Peter
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 5:39 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:10:44PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:47 PM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:23 AM Kuninori Morimoto
>>>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>>>> + - Damien Horsley <Damien.Horsley at imgtec.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> For v2, I had planned
>>>>>
>>>>>> -+ - Damien Horsley <Damien.Horsley at imgtec.com>
>>>>>> ++ - Jaroslav Kysela <perex at perex.cz>
>>>>>> ++ - Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> as Damien's address bounces.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't do that, I gather the maintainers for DT bindings are
>>>>> supposed to be people who know and care about the specific binding in
>>>>> particular.
>>>>
>>>> Sure. But how can they (still) care, if we cannot reach them?
>>>> There's no email message from Damien to be found during the past
>>>> 7 years.
>>>
>>> Then put someone that would care if the binding is deleted. As this is
>>> used on Renesas board(s), I can think of a few candidates.
>>
>> Or perhaps someone from TI? ;-)
>> This is a TI component, and also used on a TI K3 board...
Can it go w/o a Maintainer? ;)
The driver is (close to) feature complete and only needs framework
change updates.
I don't particularly care about this driver as such. Yes, the j721e EVM
uses it (which I still maintain along with the TI audio stack).
Unfortunately I don't know anyone at TI who could be assigned...
Nikita did a fix quite recently to the driver.
Nikita, are you interested?
--
Péter
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list