[PATCH] ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Shengjiu Wang]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:30 PM <cgel.zte at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci at zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao at zte.com.cn>
>

Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at gmail.com>

Best regards
Wang Shengjiu

> ---
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
> index ed444e8f1d6b..1a2bdf8e76f0 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
> @@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@ static int fsl_esai_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>                         goto err_pm_disable;
>         }
>
> -       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> +       ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
> +       if (ret < 0)
>                 goto err_pm_get_sync;
> -       }
>
>         ret = fsl_esai_hw_init(esai_priv);
>         if (ret)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>