[PATCH v3] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers don't need HAS_DMA

[Randy Dunlap]

On 9/2/21 9:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:51 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> wrote:
>> On 7/8/21 1:19 AM, Codrin.Ciubotariu at microchip.com wrote:
>>> On 08.07.2021 00:47, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> On a config (such as arch/sh/) which does not set HAS_DMA when MMU
>>>> is not set, several ATMEL ASoC drivers select symbols that cause
>>>> kconfig warnings. There is one "depends on HAS_DMA" which is no longer
>>>> needed. Dropping it eliminates the kconfig warnings and still builds
>>>> with no problems reported.
>>>>
>>>> Fix the following kconfig warnings:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
>>>>     Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>>>     Selected by [m]:
>>>>     - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m]
>>>>     - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m]
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC
>>>>     Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>>>     Selected by [m]:
>>>>     - SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI [=m]
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC
>>>>     Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>>>     Selected by [m]:
>>>>     - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m]
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
>>>>     Depends on [n]: SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && HAS_DMA [=n]
>>>>     Selected by [m]:
>>>>     - SND_ATMEL_SOC_WM8904 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && I2C [=m]
>>>>     - SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9X5_WM8731 [=m] && SOUND [=m] && !UML && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && SND_ATMEL_SOC [=m] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && ATMEL_SSC [=m] && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI [=m]
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 3951e4aae2ce ("ASoC: atmel-pcm: dma support based on pcm dmaengine")
>>>> Fixes: 18291410557f ("ASoC: atmel: enable SOC_SSC_PDC and SOC_SSC_DMA in Kconfig")
>>>> Fixes: 061981ff8cc8 ("ASoC: atmel: properly select dma driver state")
>>>
>>> I am not sure about these fixes tags. As Alexandre mentioned, it looks
>>> like the reason for HAS_DMA in the first place was the COMPILE_TEST with
>>> m32r arch. I dig a bit, and, if any, I think we should use:
>>> Fixes: eb17726b00b3 ("m32r: add simple dma")
>>> since this commit adds dummy DMA support for m32r and seems to fix the
>>> HAS_DMA dependency.
>>
>> Ah, I forgot to update the Fixes: tag(s).
>>
>> I won't disagree with your Fixes: suggestion (good digging) but
>> I would probably have used 8d7d11005e930:
>>    ASoC: atmel: fix build failure
>> which is the commit that added "depends on HAS_DMA".
> 
> M32r was not the only platform NO_DMA, so I guess the build would
> have failed for the others, too (e.g. Sun-3).
> 
> So the real fix was probably commit f29ab49b5388b2f8 ("dma-mapping:
> Convert NO_DMA get_dma_ops() into a real dummy"), or one of the
> related commits adding dummies to subsystems.

Hi Geert,
Does this mean that some other actions are needed here?
E.g. revert + a different kind of fix?

thanks.
-- 
~Randy