[RFC PATCH v3 04/13] ASoC: soc-pcm: introduce snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq/unlock_irq()

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

On 10/15/21 1:24 AM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/13/2021 8:00 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> In preparation for more changes, add two new helpers to gradually
>> modify the DPCM locks.
>>
>> Since DPCM functions are not used from interrupt handlers, we can only
>> use the lock_irq case.
>>
>> While most of the uses of DPCM are internal to soc-pcm.c, some drivers
>> in soc/fsl and soc/sh do make use of DPCM-related loops that will
>> require protection, adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is needed for those
>> drivers.
>>
>> The stream argument is unused in this patch but will be enabled in
>> follow-up patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart
>> <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   include/sound/soc-dpcm.h |  3 +++
>>   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> 1. Till this patch and with DEBUG_LOCKDEP config enabled, I see

Did you mean "with this patch included", yes?

> following warning:
>    "WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10
> warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40"
> 
>    However test passed though. Interestingly it was seen only for the
> first time I ran a 2x1 mixer test.
> 
> 2. Also after I load sound modules and card gets registered, I see some
> hw_param() calls for FE and BE. This seems harmless at this point, but
> is getting problematic with subsequent patches. This was not happening
> earier.

This patch doesn't change any of the flow, it just adds a wrapper in
preparation for the transition to the FE pcm lock.

The only change is that we use spin_lock_irq instead of the
irqsave/restore version, but that was also Takashi's recommendation.

the test results would suggest that on Tegra DPCM functions are used
from an interrupt context?