No subject

[spamassassin system account]

On 10/8/2021 9:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 07:37:12PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> On 9/28/2021 2:01 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>> In that case you should probably consider using regmap_register_patch()
>>> for corrections to the default registers in sm8250 case.
>> As regmap_register_patch() not working in this use case, updating defaults
>> in probe for sc7280 specific differences.
> In what way is regmap_register_patch() not working?

Even after using this API, reg cache is not updating with the latest 
default values.

The regmap_register_patch() implementation is bypassing Cache and 
writing values to HW.

The requirement for updating previous defaults in cache is not solving here.

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.