[BUG?] Setting (start_threshold > stop_threshold) makes snd_pcm_writei(a_small_buffer) XRUN immediately
Geraldo Nascimento
geraldogabriel at gmail.com
Sat Oct 2 01:33:20 CEST 2021
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 01:31:12AM +0800, Zhang Boyang wrote:
> Hello,
Hello, Zhang!
>
> I'm using ALSA to develop an audio-streaming application. I try to
> use start_threshold and stop_threshold in combination with small
> buffers. However, I think I probably found a bug about this.
> I'm setting start_threshold=100 and stop_threshold=50. I'm also using
> a buffer of 44 frames. When I call
> snd_pcm_writei(the_small_44_frames_buffer), pcm state came to XRUN from
> PREPARED directly. I think this is a bug because the stream hasn't
> started. It's hard to say a xrun occurred while stream not started.
> I'm wondering if this is a ALSA-bug or a misuse of ALSA. A simple bug
> test program is attached.
No, I don't think it's a bug. You're bound to run into problems with a
period size of only 44 frames.
Moreover, working with the code you provided, I was able to get a RUNNING
state without XRUNs with a period size of 4410 frames (100 milliseconds of
audio) but I had to comment out snd_pcm_sw_params_set_stop_threshold() for
it to work or I'd have those instant XRUNs.
That's how snd_pcm_sw_params_set_stop_threshold() is supposed to work by
the way. It creates a XRUN once the threshold is hit.
Thanks!
Geraldo Nascimento
> Thank you very much!
>
> Zhang Boyang
>
> p.s.
> I dug into kernel code. After writting hardware buffer,
> __snd_pcm_lib_xfer() called snd_pcm_update_state(), which set the XRUN
> state.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list