ASoC: q6dsp: q6afe: remove unneeded dead-store initialization
Nathan Chancellor
nathan at kernel.org
Wed May 12 23:15:28 CEST 2021
On 5/12/2021 1:12 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis with Coverity on linux-next has detected an issue with
> the following commit:
>
> commit 5f1b95d08de712327e452d082a50fded435ec884
> Author: Yang Li <yang.lee at linux.alibaba.com>
> Date: Sun Apr 25 18:12:33 2021 +0800
>
> ASoC: q6dsp: q6afe: remove unneeded dead-store initialization
>
> the analysis is as follows:
>
> 1181 int q6afe_port_stop(struct q6afe_port *port)
> 1182 {
> 1183 struct afe_port_cmd_device_stop *stop;
> 1184 struct q6afe *afe = port->afe;
> 1185 struct apr_pkt *pkt;
>
> 1. var_decl: Declaring variable port_id without initializer.
>
> 1186 int port_id;
> 1187 int ret = 0;
> 1188 int index, pkt_size;
> 1189 void *p;
> 1190
> 1191 index = port->token;
>
> 2. Condition index < 0, taking false branch.
> 3. Condition index >= 127, taking false branch.
>
> 1192 if (index < 0 || index >= AFE_PORT_MAX) {
> 1193 dev_err(afe->dev, "AFE port index[%d] invalid!\n",
> index);
> 1194 return -EINVAL;
> 1195 }
> 1196
> 1197 pkt_size = APR_HDR_SIZE + sizeof(*stop);
> 1198 p = kzalloc(pkt_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> 4. Condition !p, taking false branch.
>
> 1199 if (!p)
> 1200 return -ENOMEM;
> 1201
> 1202 pkt = p;
> 1203 stop = p + APR_HDR_SIZE;
> 1204
> 1205 pkt->hdr.hdr_field = APR_HDR_FIELD(APR_MSG_TYPE_SEQ_CMD,
> 1206 APR_HDR_LEN(APR_HDR_SIZE),
> 1207 APR_PKT_VER);
> 1208 pkt->hdr.pkt_size = pkt_size;
> 1209 pkt->hdr.src_port = 0;
> 1210 pkt->hdr.dest_port = 0;
> 1211 pkt->hdr.token = index;
> 1212 pkt->hdr.opcode = AFE_PORT_CMD_DEVICE_STOP;
>
> Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
> 5. uninit_use: Using uninitialized value port_id.
>
> 1213 stop->port_id = port_id;
> 1214 stop->reserved = 0;
>
> the commit removed the initialization of port_id = port->id, and now we
> have a regression where stop->port_id is being assigned with a garbage
> uninitialized value in port_id. Perhaps the fix needs reverting. As it
> stands, I don't know why clang was reporting this as an error.
>
> Colin
>
I suspect this patch was not made against a current tree. I sent a patch
that resolved this and Mark picked it up so it should be in the next
-next version:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210511190306.2418917-1-nathan@kernel.org/
Cheers,
Nathan
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list