[PATCH v4 1/2] platform/x86: dell-privacy: Add support for Dell hardware privacy

[Perry Yuan]

Hi Pierre:
Thanks for your review!
On 2021/3/8 23:59, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>>>    module_param(force_rfkill, bool, 0444);
>>>>    MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_rfkill, "enable rfkill on non whitelisted
>>>> models");
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> spurious line change
>> I just want to make them separate with more space .
>> If it cause concern, I will remote the line in V5.
> 
> it's fine to improve spaces/alignment, just do it in a separate patch.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>>    static const struct dmi_system_id dell_device_table[] __initconst 
>>>> = {
>>>>        {
>>>>            .ident = "Dell laptop",
>>>> @@ -2205,11 +2209,17 @@ static int __init dell_init(void)
>>>>        dell_laptop_register_notifier(&dell_laptop_notifier);
>>>>
>>>>        if (dell_smbios_find_token(GLOBAL_MIC_MUTE_DISABLE) &&
>>>> -        dell_smbios_find_token(GLOBAL_MIC_MUTE_ENABLE)) {
>>>> -        micmute_led_cdev.brightness =
>>> ledtrig_audio_get(LED_AUDIO_MICMUTE);
>>>> -        ret = led_classdev_register(&platform_device->dev,
>>> &micmute_led_cdev);
>>>> -        if (ret < 0)
>>>> -            goto fail_led;
>>>> +
>>>     dell_smbios_find_token(GLOBAL_MIC_MUTE_ENABLE)) {
>>>
>>> not sure why you changed the alignment?
>> The previous alignment is a little not correct.
>> So I adjust it
>> If it cause concern, will restore it to original shape.
> 
> same here, use a different patch.
> 
As you suggested,I should add the alignment change in another patch.
But if i keep the old alignment, the code will be very odd.
Seems like that I have to change the below code to new alignment in this 
patch.

if (dell_smbios_find_token(GLOBAL_MIC_MUTE_DISABLE) &&
     dell_smbios_find_token(GLOBAL_MIC_MUTE_ENABLE)) { <<--- changed back
	if (!privacy_valid)
	    	has_privacy = true;
	else
	    	has_privacy = false;
	if (!has_privacy) {
		micmute_led_cdev.brightness <<----------- new alignment
		...
	}
...
}