[PATCH v4 13/13] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: Add jack detect support

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 1/30/21 4:40 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Add jack detect support by creating a jack and calling
>> snd_soc_component_set_jack to register the created jack
>> with the codec.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> +static struct snd_soc_jack_pin byt_wm5102_pins[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.pin	= "Headphone",
>> +		.mask	= SND_JACK_HEADPHONE,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.pin	= "Headset Mic",
>> +		.mask	= SND_JACK_MICROPHONE,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
> 
> This patch looks fine to me, but I did have one small question.
> What is the thinking behind punting this to the machine driver?
> 
> I guess you can not register it if there is no jack present
> on the board, or if you have multiple jacks name them
> meaningfully. Although I sort of feel like those applied to
> the old extcon approach that just internally registered all
> the interfaces.

To be honest I'm not 100% sure why this is done this way,
this is how *all* ASoC drivers do it (AFAICT).

I think it is done this way because of 2 reasons:

1. The pins controlled by the jack are what for lack of
a better word I call "end-point" pins. And these get
registered by the machine-driver, so to make sure that
the names match it makes sense to also declare the
snd_soc_jack_pin array in the machine-driver.
For example the "Headphone" pin is a widget registered
by the machine driver as:

        SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("Headphone", NULL),

2. Probe ordering, the jack gets attached to the card and
when the coded driver's probe function runs the card does
not exist yet. But I think that could be worked around by
doing things in the component-probe function.

Regards,

Hans