[Sound-open-firmware] [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: avoid reverse module dependency

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

>> Since this is going to be a really invasive change, and past
>> experience shows that mucking with Kconfigs will invariably raise a
>> number of broken corner cases, if there is support from
>> Mark/Takashi/Jaroslav on this idea, we should first test it in the SOF
>> tree so that we get a good test coverage and don't break too many eggs
>> in Mark's tree. We would also need to concurrently change our CI
>> scripts which are dependent on module names.
> 
> I'm in favor of the way Arnd proposed.  It's more straightforward and
> less code.

Thanks Takashi for the feedback.

Since yesterday I looked at another problem where we can have unmet 
dependencies between SoundWire (m) and SOF (y), so we probably need to 
rethink all this. We had similar issue with SOF and HDaudio before, it's 
time to revisit all this.

> 
> If you find the number of modules or the too much cutting out being
> problematic, you can create a module snd-sof-intel-acpi and
> snd-sof-intel-pci containing the driver table entries for all Intel
> devices, too.  In the case, you'll still need some conditional calls
> of intel-dsp-config there, but it's a good step for reducing the
> Kconfig complexity.
> 
>> Also maybe in a first pass we can remove the compilation error with
>> IS_REACHABLE and in a second pass do more invasive surgery?
> 
> Agreed, we'd like to keep less changes for 5.11 for now.

Ack, we'll send smaller changes first.