[PATCH 6/6] soundwire: qcom: add support to new interrupts
Srinivas Kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Mon Feb 1 16:51:13 CET 2021
On 01/02/2021 14:31, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 29-01-21, 17:32, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> Add support to new interrupts and update irq routine in a way
>> to deal with multiple pending interrupts with in a single interrupt!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> index d61b204dc284..c699bd51d29a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> @@ -28,10 +28,21 @@
>> #define SWRM_COMP_PARAMS_DIN_PORTS_MASK GENMASK(9, 5)
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS 0x200
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK GENMASK(16, 0)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SLAVE_PEND_IRQ BIT(0)
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_NEW_SLAVE_ATTACHED BIT(1)
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CHANGE_ENUM_SLAVE_STATUS BIT(2)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET BIT(3)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(4)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RD_FIFO_UNDERFLOW BIT(5)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_WR_CMD_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(6)
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR BIT(7)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_DOUT_PORT_COLLISION BIT(8)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_READ_EN_RD_VALID_MISMATCH BIT(9)
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_SPECIAL_CMD_ID_FINISHED BIT(10)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_BUS_RESET_FINISHED_V2 BIT(13)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CLK_STOP_FINISHED_V2 BIT(14)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_EXT_CLK_STOP_WAKEUP BIT(16)
>> +#define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MAX 17
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_MASK_ADDR 0x204
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CLEAR 0x208
>> #define SWRM_INTERRUPT_CPU_EN 0x210
>> @@ -105,11 +116,8 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> void __iomem *mmio;
>> - struct completion *comp;
>> struct completion broadcast;
>> struct work_struct slave_work;
>> - /* read/write lock */
>> - spinlock_t comp_lock;
>> /* Port alloc/free lock */
>> struct mutex port_lock;
>> struct mutex io_lock;
>> @@ -126,6 +134,7 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>> int rows_index;
>> unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>> unsigned long din_port_mask;
>> + u32 intr_mask;
>> u8 rcmd_id;
>> u8 wcmd_id;
>> struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>> @@ -315,6 +324,27 @@ static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int qcom_swrm_get_alert_slave(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS, &val);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
>> + u32 s;
>
> define at top of the function pls, also maybe better name status?
Sure,
>
>> +
>> + s = (val >> (i * 2));
>
> why * 2 ? Maybe add a comment for this logic
This is status mask of 2 bits! Will clarify this in next version!
>
>> +
>> + if ((s & SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK) == SDW_SLAVE_ALERT) {
>> + ctrl->status[i] = s;
>> + return i;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>> @@ -333,40 +363,122 @@ static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>>
>> static irqreturn_t qcom_swrm_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> {
>> - struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_id;
>> - u32 sts, value;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> - ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS, &sts);
>> -
>> - if (sts & SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_CMD_ERROR) {
>> - ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_STATUS, &value);
>> - dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
>> - "CMD error, fifo status 0x%x\n",
>> - value);
>> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
>> - }
>> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm = dev_id;
>> + u32 value, intr_sts, intr_sts_masked;
>> + u32 i;
>> + u8 devnum = 0;
>> + int ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +
>> +
>> + swrm->reg_read(swrm, SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS, &intr_sts);
>> + intr_sts_masked = intr_sts & swrm->intr_mask;
>> +
>> +handle_irq:
>
> maybe move this into a fn and avoid a goto for non err path?
>
Makes sense!
--srini
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list