I: dmix optimization
Giuliano Zannetti - ART S.p.A.
giuliano.zannetti at artgroup-spa.com
Tue Aug 3 09:26:38 CEST 2021
Hi,
I'm trying to optimize the dmix because I'm working with a big number of channels (up to 16) and in this case the dmix has not a negligible impact on performance.
I'm working with ALSA 1.1.9. I gave my first look to the generic_mix_areas_16_native function (https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-lib/blob/v1.1.9/src/pcm/pcm_dmix_generic.c#L130).
I would ask you if I can avoid to check, for each loop iteration, if the current dst sample is not 0.
for (;;) {
sample = *src;
if (! *dst) {
*sum = sample;
*dst = *src;
} else {
sample += *sum;
*sum = sample;
if (sample > 0x7fff)
sample = 0x7fff;
else if (sample < -0x8000)
sample = -0x8000;
*dst = sample;
}
if (!--size)
return;
src = (signed short *) ((char *)src + src_step);
dst = (signed short *) ((char *)dst + dst_step);
sum = (signed int *) ((char *)sum + sum_step);
}
Could it be possible check for the first sample of the period only, as reported in the code below? My assumption is that if dst[0] is 0 also dst[1] ... dst[period-1] will be 0, and I don't need to check every time. This is already an optimization, but it could be also a starting point for other optimization based on my HW. But, first of all, I would ask to you if my assumption is right.
if (! *dst) {
for (;;) {
sample = *src;
*sum = sample;
*dst = *src;
if (!--size)
return;
src = (signed short *) ((char *)src + src_step);
dst = (signed short *) ((char *)dst + dst_step);
sum = (signed int *) ((char *)sum + sum_step);
}
} else {
for (;;) {
sample = *src;
sample += *sum;
*sum = sample;
if (sample > 0x7fff)
sample = 0x7fff;
else if (sample < -0x8000)
sample = -0x8000;
*dst = sample;
if (!--size)
return;
src = (signed short *) ((char *)src + src_step);
dst = (signed short *) ((char *)dst + dst_step);
sum = (signed int *) ((char *)sum + sum_step);
}
}
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Giuliano
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list