[PATCH v6 3/5] Asoc:qcom:lpass-cpu:Update dts property read API

Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Tue Sep 22 13:22:38 CEST 2020



On 22/09/2020 12:08, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On 18/09/2020 07:04, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "lpass-lpaif");
>> Index is always preferred over name w.r.t device tree bindings, so lets
>> stick with that for now!
> It is?  That's not usually the case...
> 
>> Unless you have any strong reason to lookup resource by name?
> Looking things up by name tends to make the DT easier to read (since
> things are named).

I agree with you on this and I see the point, but Rob had a very 
different opinion about the reg-names bindings to start with.

This topic been discussed in the past with Rob in many instances ex: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@mail.gmail.com/

According to him, reg-names seems to be highly discouraged as it came 
along for the OMAP folks and was related to the hwmods stuff.


--srini



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list